Enhancing Entrepreneurial Learning: Modeling Mentoring to Design New Means of Entrepreneurial Learning
There are two problems
being addressed by this thesis, the first is the problem of access to
mentors and the second is the problem of communication between mentor
and entrepreneur. Both problems were discovered in the process of
learning about the challenges information technology startups face.
Tackling these two problems is one way to reduce the seventy percent
of startups that scale prematurely, which is shown to be a major
cause of the ninety percent failure rate of startups. Essentially,
tackling access and communication are two steps towards enhancing
entrepreneurial learning and experience transfer between novice and
experienced entrepreneurs in the context of a mentor interaction.
The first take-away from my
interviews is that entrepreneurs operating in this area of business,
information technology startups, are concerned about three major
topics: mentoring, funding, and traction. An added layer of
complexity is that funding is usually, but not always, needed to
provide runway for the startup to get off the ground. To get funding,
traction is usually needed. Funding can be broken down into early
stage and late stage. Early stage funding goes towards figuring out a
repeatable business model and a product-market fit. Late stage
funding is focused on execution and further refinement on the already
discovered repeatable business model. Furthermore, mentors are
perceived as a form of traction because they believe in the company's
idea, product, team, and lend their credibility. Essentially, this
means that if funding is needed, mentors may prove to be a first
point of traction, thus aiding the startup to get off the ground.
From literature, I learned the story is more complex than simply
going after mentors to attract funding. With mentoring comes many
pedagogical supports for the startup and entrepreneur.
The problem of access to
mentors has four underlying problems that gives rise to the lack of
access to mentors. First is the geographic separation between
entrepreneurs and mentors. The second is that experienced
entrepreneurs don't always self-identify as mentors even though they
have experience to strategize with novice entrepreneurs. The third
underlying problem are busy-schedules. The fourth hurdle is the need
for serendipity, and this is where trust and the nature of human
relationships plays factor.
The problem of
communication between mentor and entrepreneur is a problem that
emerges once the novice entrepreneur has access to the experienced
entrepreneur. There are two problems I've become aware of that act as
barriers, preventing knowledge and experience from effectively
transferring from experienced to novice entrepreneur. The first is a
stigma with taking notes. The second is a high-low level disconnect;
essentially, there's a disconnect between the strategies discussed in
conversation and the actionable steps taken afterward.
The interactions that are
being designed and prototyped are framed by these two problems:
access and communication. The designs that address the problem of
access use the four underlying issues as design constraints for each
prototype. The designs for communication follow the same rule, use
the identified underlying issues as design constraints. Since both
problems have a great deal of overlap, all six constraints are
considered when designing each prototype.
The designs being
prototyped include: beer coasters, name tags, napkins, a worksheet, a
website, and a smart phone app. The two identified physical
environments to implement these prototypes include face-to-face
networking events and one-on-one interactions between novice and
experienced entrepreneurs.
Back to Table of Contents.
Back to Table of Contents.
No comments:
Post a Comment