In “Entrepreneurial Learning: a
narrative-based conceptual model,” David Rae identifies three major
areas that play a factor in the entrepreneur's learning: personal and
social emergence, contextual learning, and negotiated enterprise.
Personal and social emergence is the creation of the individual's
self-perception as an entrepreneur. Essentially, believing that one's
person can turn an idea into reality. Contextual learning is the use
of one's knowledge and experience within an industry or community to
recognize opportunities that ventures can be formed around.
Negotiated enterprise is the process of engaging with other people to
exchange labor, ideas, learned strategies, or capital (2).
Peter Erdelyi argues that
entrepreneurial learning has two branches: one that involves personal
learning and another that involves collective learning. Personal
learning is focuses on the individual and her experiences, and is the
process of “opportunity recognition” and constitutes the
“cognitive mechanisms for identifying entrepreneurial business
opportunities and making decisions about them” (3). Collective
learning arises from the interaction of individuals within a firm or
within an ecosystem. Both modes of learning give rise to behaviors
that encourages the entrepreneur to acquire and use resources
available within her network (3)
Berglund,
Hellstrom, and Sjolander propose a model of entrepreneurial learning
as a forward oscillation between two modes: hypothesis testing and
hermeneutic learning. Hypothesis testing is coming up with an
hypothesis and then preparing an experiment that allows to test the
validity and soundness of the hypothesis, thus leading to learning.
Hermeneutic learning, in contrast to hypothesis testing, occurs
experientially and is tacit to the actions the entrepreneur makes.
The entrepreneurs and the collection of individuals that comprise a
startup, then fluctuate between these two states as they accumulate
incremental knowledge about the product they're building, the
customer's they're building it for, the market they're operating in,
etc (1). Even though Berglund et al propose this model of
entrepreneurial learning as a way to explain how venture capitalists
influence entrepreneurial behavior, I think taking this model can be
used within the context of a mentoring relationship to make obvious
the entrepreneur's learning behaviors.
These researchers
all hit upon a dichotomy between the individual and the networks
they're a part of. The relationships the entrepreneur has with those
internal to the startup and those external to the startup seems to
determine the behaviors she learns, the opportunities she can
recognize, and the opportunities she can act upon. What I mean is
that entrepreneurial activity is inherently social in nature – it's
both limited and enabled by the network the entrepreneur is a part
of. It's limited by the size of the network and those she can learn
from, and enabled by the people she's in contact with because she can
learn new business strategies from her fellow entrepreneurs. This
means that for the context of this thesis, mentors with business
experience existing in the entrepreneur's network enable the learning
of new strategies, behaviors, and can increase the size of the
entrepreneur's network via introductions to new contacts.
Entrepreneurial learning, from a mentoring perspective, is a feedback
process to develop new strategies the entrepreneur can execute upon
to continue managing her business.
The next section
will go into a discussion of the different ways a mentor enables
entrepreneurial learning.
Sources:
- Berglund, Henrik, Tomas Hellstrom, Soren Sjolander. "Entrepreneurial Learning and the Role of Venture Capitalists." Venture Capital July 2007: Vol. 9, No. 3, 165 - 181.
- Rae, David. "Entrepreneurial learning: a narrative-based conceptual model." Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 2005. Vol. 12 No. 3, 323 - 335.
- Erdelyi, Peter. "The Matter of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Literature Review."
No comments:
Post a Comment